# PatternsRadar vs other stock screeners

> Feature-by-feature comparisons with the screeners and research tools Indian traders use — each stating what the other tool is better at.

Canonical: https://patternsradar.com/compare

- [Chartink alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/chartink-alternative.md): Where Chartink's backtest stops — the list of past matches, without what they did next — and what it still does better.
- [PatternsRadar vs Chartink](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-chartink.md): The two screeners feature by feature: backtesting, event conditions, data depth, alerts, API.
- [Trendlyne alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/trendlyne-alternative.md): PatternsRadar as a Trendlyne alternative for technical screening: unmetered backtesting on every scan, a readable query language, delivery analysis and an API — from ₹0.
- [PatternsRadar vs Trendlyne](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-trendlyne.md): Trendlyne is a research platform with a screener inside; PatternsRadar is a technical screener with testing built in. Backtest quotas, query models, delivery data, APIs and pricing, compared honestly.
- [StockEdge alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/stockedge-alternative.md): PatternsRadar as a StockEdge alternative: write any scan instead of picking from 500, backtest every one against 250 sessions, and screen delivery percentage with evidence — free, no account.
- [PatternsRadar vs StockEdge](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-stockedge.md): StockEdge curates 500+ readymade EOD scans; PatternsRadar lets you write and backtest your own. Scan models, delivery analysis, custom-scan quotas, APIs and pricing, compared honestly.
- [TradingView alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/tradingview-screener-alternative.md): PatternsRadar as an NSE-focused alternative to TradingView's stock screener: scan-level backtesting, delivery percentage, event conditions and 30 years of history — things a global screener doesn't carry.
- [PatternsRadar vs TradingView](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-tradingview.md): TradingView's screener is real-time, global and chart-first; PatternsRadar is EOD, NSE-only and scan-first. Backtesting scope, delivery data, query models, history depth and pricing, compared honestly.
- [Screener.in alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/screener-in-alternative.md): Looking past Screener.in? If it's for fundamentals, stay — it's the best there is. If you've hit its technical ceiling (DMA fields, no backtesting, no delivery data), that's the half PatternsRadar covers.
- [PatternsRadar vs Screener.in](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-screener-in.md): Screener.in screens businesses from ten years of financials; PatternsRadar screens price behaviour from thirty years of daily bars, with backtesting. Mostly different jobs — compared honestly, including the narrow overlap.
- [Tickertape alternative](https://patternsradar.com/compare/tickertape-alternative.md): Tickertape's screener stops at menu filters — SMA, EMA and RSI thresholds, Pro-gated, untestable. PatternsRadar picks up there: write any condition, backtest it, screen delivery — free.
- [PatternsRadar vs Tickertape](https://patternsradar.com/compare/patternsradar-vs-tickertape.md): Tickertape is a broad research app whose screener is menu filters; PatternsRadar is a technical screener with a query language and backtesting. Filters vs sentences, scorecards vs evidence — compared honestly.